Reuters US: Latest News

The Fin-brain tell you here

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Quotation sheet for EFB-CS 20200609

good afternoon!

EFB-CS, fixed table overlock sewing machine

Price: US$5900/Unit FOB Ningbo


 

  1. Automatic deceleration of corners: YES
  2. Head: SINGER 300U
  3. Lifting range of worktable: 140mm
  4. Workbench size: 1600x2000mm
  5. Table lifting form: automatic
  6. Overlock mattress thickness: 30-450mm
  7. Production efficiency (pcs/hour): 10-20
  8. Total motor power: 1.2KW
  9. Voltage: 220V, 1P, 50HZ

Our quotation is for standard models and voltage "220V, 1P, 50HZ", if you need to customize, please inform us in time.

Attached is the quotation, please check it and wait for your reply, thank you

Best regards!

2020-08-06

 

Monday, August 10, 2020

Quotation sheet for EFB-CS 20200609

good afternoon!

EFB-CS, fixed table overlock sewing machine

Price: US$5900/Unit FOB Ningbo


 

  1. Automatic deceleration of corners: YES
  2. Head: SINGER 300U
  3. Lifting range of worktable: 140mm
  4. Workbench size: 1600x2000mm
  5. Table lifting form: automatic
  6. Overlock mattress thickness: 30-450mm
  7. Production efficiency (pcs/hour): 10-20
  8. Total motor power: 1.2KW
  9. Voltage: 220V, 1P, 50HZ

Our quotation is for standard models and voltage "220V, 1P, 50HZ", if you need to customize, please inform us in time.

Attached is the quotation, please check it and wait for your reply, thank you

Best regards!

2020-08-06

 

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Atul Baride has invited you to join Rediff MyPage

rediff.com

Hi,

I would like to add you as a friend on Rediff MyPage, a great place to keep in touch with friends, post photos and videos.

Add me as friend

Cheers,
Atul Baride

This mail was originally meant for barideatul.mainstreet@blogger.com. If you are not the intended recipient please ignore this mail.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

How Can American Police Spray pepper on Children



This is Bad and Barbaric that Police are Spraying Pepper on the protesting Students. As matter of fact Police should not be allowed to Use any kind of Spray or even that of water on the protesting students. How come Mayor of California is not begging for his Job to allow Such a cruelty..?

US Government has a vary big Mouth when it comes to Organised atrocities and Use of Governmental Powers and authority in other nations and but this Worst seen by me.

I totally protest this and Mayor of California should Apologise and who so ever the Teacher of the school and the cops in the video should be Sacked .

Thursday, August 18, 2011

India Foreign Exchange Management : Reserve Bank Of India

I.4 Movement of Reserves

I.4.1 Review of Growth of Reserves since 1991

India’s foreign exchange reserves have grown significantly since 1991. The reserves stood at US$ 5.8 billion at end-March 1991. The reserves stood at US$ 304.8 billion as on March 31, 2011 compared to US $ 292.9 billion as on September, 2010. (Table 1 &Chart 1).

Although both US dollar and Euro are intervention currencies and the FCA are maintained in major currencies like US dollar, Euro, Pound Sterling, Japanese Yen etc., the foreign exchange reserves are denominated and expressed in US dollar only. Movements in the FCA occur mainly on account of purchases and sales of foreign exchange by the RBI in the foreign exchange market in India. In addition, income arising out of the deployment of the foreign exchange reserves and the external aid receipts of the Central Government also flow into the reserves. The movement of the US dollar against other currencies in which FCA are held also impact the level of reserves in US dollar terms.

Table 1 : Movement in  Foreign Exchange Reserves

(US$ million)

Date

FCA

SDR

Gold

RTP

Forex Reserves

31-Mar-10

254,685

5006 (3297)

  17,986

1,380

279,057

30-Sep-10

265,231

5130 (3297)

20,516

1,993

292,870

31-Mar-11

274,330

4569 (2882)

22,972

2,947

304,818

Notes:  1. FCA (Foreign Currency Assets): FCAs are maintained as a multi-currency   portfolio comprising major currencies, such as, US dollar, Euro, Pound sterling, Japanese yen, etc. and are valued in terms of US dollars.

2. FCA excludes US$ 250.0 million invested in foreign currency denominated bonds issued by IIFC (UK) since March 20, 2009.

3. SDR (Special Drawing Rights): Values in SDR have been indicated in parentheses.

4. RTP refers to the Reserve Tranche Position in the IMF.

clip_image001

I.4.2 Sources of Accretion to the reserves

Table 2 provides details of sources of variation in foreign exchange reserves during 2010-11 vis-à-vis the corresponding period of the previous year. On balance of payments basis (i.e., excluding valuation effects), the foreign exchange reserves increased by US$ 13.1 billion during 2010-11 as against an increase of US$ 13.4 billion during 2009-10. The valuation gain, reflecting the depreciation of the US dollar against the major international currencies, accounted for US$ 12.7 billion during 2010-11 as compared to a valuation gain of US$ 13.6 billion during 2009-10. Accordingly, valuation gain during 2010-11 accounted for 49.2 per cent of the total increase in foreign exchange reserves.

Table 2: Sources of Variation in Foreign Exchange Reserves

(US$ billion)

Items

2009-10

2010-11

April-March

April-March

I.

Current Account Balance

-38.4

-44.3

II.

Capital Account (net) (a to f)

51.8

57.3

a.

Foreign Investment (i+ii)

51.2

37.4

       (i) Foreign Direct Investment

18.8

7.1

      (ii) Portfolio Investment

32.4

30.3

Of which:

       FIIs

29.0

29.4

      ADRs/GDRs

3.3

2.0

b.

External Commercial Borrowings

2.8

11.9

c.

Banking Capital

2.1

5.0

    of which: NRI Deposits

2.9

3.2

d.

Short-Term Trade Credit

7.6

11.0

e.

External Assistance

2.9

4.9

f.

Other items in capital account*

-14.8

-12.8

III.

Valuation Change

13.6

12.7

Total (I+II+III) @

27.1

25.8

Note:*: (i) ‘Other items in capital account’ apart from ‘Errors and Omissions’ also include SDR allocations, leads and lags in exports, funds held abroad, advances received pending issue of shares under FDI and transactions of capital receipts not included elsewhere.(ii) Increase in reserves  (+) / Decrease in reserves (-).

@: Difference, if any, is due to rounding off

I.5 External Liabilities vis-à-vis Foreign Exchange Reserves

The accretion of foreign exchange reserves needs to be seen in the light of total external liabilities of the country. India’s International Investment Position (IIP) (which is a summary record of the stock of country’s external financial assets and liabilities) as at end March 2011 is furnished in Table 3 .

Table 3: International Investment Position of India

(US$ billion)

Item

March 2011

A

Total External Assets

424.5

1.

Direct Investment Abroad

98.2

2.

Portfolio Investment

1.5

3.

Other Investments

20.0

4.

Foreign Exchange Reserves

304.8

B

Total External Liabilities

643.4

1.

Direct Investment in India

204.2

2.

Portfolio Investment

173.9

3.

Other Investments

265.3

Net IIP (A-B)

(-) 218.9

P: Provisional.

The net IIP as at end March 2011 was negative at US$ 218.9 billion, implying that our external liabilities are more than the external assets. The net IIP as at end March 2009 and 2010 was US$ (-) 66.6 billion and US$ (-) 158.4 billion respectively.

I.6 Adequacy of Reserves

Adequacy of reserves has emerged as an important parameter in gauging the ability to absorb external shocks. With the changing profile of capital flows, the traditional approach of assessing reserve adequacy in terms of import cover has been broadened to include a number of parameters which take into account the size, composition and risk profiles of various types of capital flows as well as the types of external shocks to which the economy is vulnerable. The High Level Committee on Balance of Payments, which was chaired by Dr. C. Rangarajan, erstwhile Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, had suggested that, while determining the adequacy of reserves, due attention should be paid to payment obligations, in addition to the traditional measure of import cover of 3 to 4 months. In 1997, the Report of Committee on Capital Account Convertibility under the chairmanship of Shri S.S.Tarapore, erstwhile Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India suggested alternative measures of adequacy of reserves which, in addition to trade-based indicators, also included money-based and debt-based indicators. Similar views have been held by the Committee on Fuller Capital Account Convertibility (Chairman: Shri S.S.Tarapore, July 2006). In the recent period, assessment of reserve adequacy has been influenced by the introduction of new measures. One such measure requires that the usable foreign exchange reserves should exceed scheduled amortisation of foreign currency debts (assuming no rollovers) during the following year. The other one is based on a 'Liquidity at Risk' rule that takes into account the foreseeable risks that a country could face. This approach requires that a country's foreign exchange liquidity position could be calculated under a range of possible outcomes for relevant financial variables, such as, exchange rates, commodity prices, credit spreads etc. Reserve Bank of India has been undertaking exercises based on intuition and risk models to estimate 'Liquidity at Risk’ (LAR) of the reserves.

At the end of March 2011, the import cover declined to 9.6 months from 11.1 months at end-March 2010. The ratio of short-term debt1 to the foreign exchange reserves was 18.8 per cent at end-March 2010 and it increased to 21.3 per cent at end-March 2011. The ratio of volatile capital flows (defined to include cumulative portfolio inflows and short-term debt) to the reserves increased from 58.1 per cent as at end-March 2010 to 67.3 per cent as at end-March 2011.

I.7. Management of Gold Reserves

The Reserve Bank held 557.75 tonnes of gold forming about 7.5 per cent of the total foreign exchange reserves in value terms as on March 31, 2011. Of these, 265.49 tonnes are held abroad (65.49 tonnes since 1991 and further 200 tonnes since November 2009) in deposits / safe custody with the Bank of England and the Bank for International Settlements.

I.8 Investment Pattern and Earnings of the Foreign Currency Assets

The foreign currency assets are invested in multi-currency, multi-asset portfolios as per the existing norms which are similar to the best international practices followed in this regard. As at end-March 2011, out of the total foreign currency assets of US$ 274.3 billion, US$ 142.1 billion was invested in securities, US$ 126.9 billion was deposited with other central banks, BIS and the IMF and US$ 5.3 billion was placed with the External Asset Managers (EAMs) (Table 4). A small portion of the reserves has been assigned to the EAMs with the main objective of gaining access to and deriving benefits from their expertise and market research

Table 4 : Deployment Pattern of Foreign Currency Assets

(US$ Million)

As on March 31, 2011

As on September 30, 2010

Foreign Currency Assets *

274,330

265,231

(a)Securities

142,107

146,377

(b) Deposits with other central banks, BIS & IMF

126,900

113,613

(c) Deposits with foreign commercial banks / funds placed with EAMs

5323

5,241

* Excludes US$ 250 million invested in foreign currency denominated bonds issued by IIFC (UK).

The rate of earnings on foreign currency assets and gold, after accounting for depreciation, decreased from 4.16 per cent in July 2008 - June 2009 to 2.09 in July 2009 to June 2010 reflecting the generally low global interest rate environment.

I.9 Other Related Aspects

I.9.1 Pre-payment

There was no pre-payment of any debt during the half year October 2010 to March 2011.

I.9.2 Financial Transaction Plan (FTP) of the IMF

International Monetary Fund (IMF) designated India as a creditor under its Financial Transaction Plan (FTP) in February 2003. During the half year October 2010 to March 2011 SDR 160 million was made available to Ireland and SDR 68 million to Greece. The Total purchase transactions amounted to SDR 1422.16 million as at the end of March 2011. India was included in repurchase transactions of the FTP since November 2005. There was no repurchase transaction during October 2010 to March 2011.

I.9.3 Investments under Note Purchase Agreement with IMF

In order to strengthen the IMF’s lendable resources, the RBI had entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (NPA) with the IMF under which the RBI had committed to purchase IMF Notes for an amount up to the equivalent of US$10 billion. The RBI has subscribed to US$ 1143.5 million Notes issued under the NPA till end-March 2011. The IMF’s amended and expanded New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) became effective on March 11, 2011. India has committed to providing resources up to SDR 8740.82 million to the IMF under this arrangement which shall subsume commitment made under NPA. Under the NAB, the Government of India is the participant while the RBI shall hold the NAB claims.

Part II: Risk Management

II.1. Risk Management

Sound risk management is an integral part of efficient foreign exchange reserves management. The strategy for reserves management places emphasis on managing and controlling the exposure to financial and operational risks associated with deployment of reserves. The broad strategy for reserve management including currency composition and investment policy is decided in consultation with the Government of India. The risk management functions are aimed at ensuring development of sound governance structure in line with the best international practices, improved accountability, a culture of risk awareness across all operations and efficient allocation of resources for development of in-house skills and expertise. The risks attendant on deployment of reserves, viz., credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk and operational risk and the systems employed to manage these risks are detailed in the following paragraphs.

II.1.1 Credit Risk

Credit risk is defined as the potential that a borrower or counterparty will fail to meet its obligation in accordance with agreed terms. The Reserve Bank has been extremely sensitive to the credit risk it faces on the investment of foreign exchange reserves in the international markets. The Reserve Bank's investments in bonds/treasury bills represent debt obligations of highly rated sovereigns and supranational entities. Further, deposits are placed with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and other central banks.

Credit risk has been in focus since the onset of the credit crisis in the US financial markets and its contagion effect on other economies leading to global financial crisis during the second half of 2008 and during 2009. The Reserve Bank continues to apply stringent criteria for selection of counterparties. Credit exposure vis-à-vis sanctioned limit in respect of approved counterparties is monitored continuously. Developments regarding counterparties are constantly under watch. The basic objective of such an on-going exercise is to assess whether counterparty's credit quality is under potential threat.

II.1.2 Market Risk

Market risk for a multi-currency portfolio represents the potential change in valuations that result from movements in financial market prices for example, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. The major sources of the market risk for central banks are currency risk, interest rate risk and movement in gold prices.

II.1.2.1 Currency Risk: Currency risk arises due to uncertainty in exchange rates. Decisions are taken regarding the long-term exposure on different currencies depending on the likely movements in exchange rate and other considerations in the medium and long-term (e.g., maintenance of major portion of reserves in the intervention currency, the approximate currency profile of the reserves in line with the changing external trade profile of the country, benefit of diversification, etc.). The decision making procedure is supported by reviews of the strategy on a regular basis.

II.1.2.2 Interest Rate Risk: The crucial aspect of the management of interest rate risk is to protect the value of the investments as much as possible from the adverse impact of the interest rate movements. The interest rate sensitivity of the reserves portfolio is identified in terms of benchmark duration and the permitted deviation from the benchmark. The focus of the investment strategy revolves around the need to keep the interest rate risk of the portfolio reasonably low with a view to minimising losses arising out of adverse interest rate movements, if any.

II.1.3 Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk involves the risk of not being able to sell an instrument or close a position when required without facing significant costs. The reserves need to have a high level of liquidity at all times in order to be able to meet any unforeseen and emergency needs. Any adverse development has to be met with reserves and, hence, the need for a highly liquid portfolio is a necessary constraint in the investment strategy. The choice of instruments determines the liquidity of the portfolio. For example, in some markets, treasury securities could be liquidated in large volumes without much distortion of the price in the market and, thus, can be considered as liquid. In fact, excepting fixed deposits with the BIS, foreign commercial banks and central banks and securities issued by supranationals, almost all other types of investments are in highly liquid instruments which could be converted into cash at short notice. The Reserve Bank closely monitors the portion of the reserves which could be converted into cash at a very short notice to meet any unforeseen / emergent needs.

II.1.4 Operational Risk and Control System

In tune with the global trend, considerable attention is paid to strengthen the operational risk control arrangements. Key operational procedures are documented. Internally, there is total separation of the front office and back office functions and the internal control systems ensure several checks at the stages of deal capture, deal processing and settlement. The deal processing and settlement system is also subject to internal control guidelines based on the principle of one point data entry and powers are delegated to officers at various levels for generation of payment instructions. There is a system of concurrent audit for monitoring compliance in respect of all the internal control guidelines. Further, reconciliation of accounts is done regularly. In addition to annual inspection by the internal machinery of the Reserve Bank for this purpose and statutory audit of accounts by external auditors, there is a system of appointing special external auditors to audit the dealing room operations. There is a comprehensive reporting mechanism covering significant areas of activity / operations relating to reserve management. These are being provided to the senior management periodically, viz., on daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly intervals, depending on the type and sensitivity of information. The Reserve Bank uses SWIFT as the messaging platform to settle its trades and send financial messages to its counterparties, banks with whom nostro accounts are maintained, custodians of securities and other business partners.

II.1.5 ISO Certification

The Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) of the Department of External Investments and Operations of the Bank is compliant with the provisions of ISO 27001 Standards.

Part III: Transparency and Disclosures

The Reserve Bank has been making available in the public domain data relating to foreign exchange reserves, its operations in foreign exchange market, position of the country’s external assets and liabilities and earnings from deployment of foreign currency assets and gold through periodic press releases of its Weekly Statistical Supplements, monthly Bulletins, Annual Reports, etc. The Reserve Bank's approach with regard to transparency and disclosure closely follows international best practices in this regard. The Reserve Bank is among the 68 central banks across the globe which has adopted the Special Data Dissemination Standards (SDDS) template of the IMF for publication of the detailed data on foreign exchange reserves. Such data are made available on monthly basis on the Reserve Bank's website.

Pasted from <http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=13555#1>

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Clean Energy Investment .. an Investor Point

Global Clean Energy Investment Is In The Spotlight Due To Policy Uncertainties: "

Clean energy is getting cheaper to generate every day. And as worldwide demand for energy continues to grow, governments are concerned about the security of their supply and the potential impact that burning more fossil fuels will have on global warming. As a result, investment in clean energy is running at record levels.



Nevertheless, clean energy still isn't economical on its own, meaning that government support--through subsidies and regulations--remains essential. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services sees a number of credit risks facing issuers in clean energy-related industries. These risks relate to the sustainability of renewable energy incentives and government policies on low carbon generation, along with transmission capacity constraints and the reliability of some newer technologies. In addition, there are geopolitical concerns arising from political unrest and/or an overreliance on fossil-fuel-producing economies, especially in the Middle East and North Africa.



Overview





  • Market expansion in the growing and increasingly competitive global clean energy sector is occurring amidst a host of economic, geopolitical, and policy challenges facing the industry, especially related to public sector support of renewable energy and nuclear power generation.

  • Policies and regulations appear to be in a state of flux. Recent moves by Spain and the Czech Republic to cut the subsidies applicable to existing operational renewable energy projects demonstrate to us that regulatory risk is assuming greater importance.

  • We expect investor interest will remain high as long as incentives remain for global clean energy development. However, we believe governments may not be able to sustain these incentives.



The global economy will need to figure out a way to meet rising energy demand and constrain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions so that global temperature rises do not exceed two degrees Celsius by 2050. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that, to reach those goals, we'll need to invest more than $30 trillion in energy infrastructure over the next 25 years. According to the Pew Charitable Trusts, investment in clean power assets alone could reach $2.3 trillion over 2010-2020. However, that milestone may be difficult to achieve as governments try to cut spending.



Worldwide Investment In Clean Energy Hits A High




In 2010, global investments in clean energy reached a record level of $243 billion--up by 30% compared with 2009. Collectively, the EU was the leading recipient of this finance, attracting a total of $94.4 billion. Investments in small-scale solar installations in Germany and Italy, for example, were about double their 2009 level, at $41.2 billion and $13.9 billion, respectively.



In Asia, clean energy investment rose 33% to $82.8 billion. China recorded a similar increase, up 39% to $54.4 billion, at the same time surpassing the U.S. as the country with the most installed clean energy capacity in megawatts.



Changing Regulations Could Dampen Investor Interest In Low-Carbon Assets




It appears that , investor interest will remain high while considerable incentives remain for global clean energy development. However, the policies and regulations appear to be in a state of flux, due to the sometimes conflicting objectives of encouraging renewable energy investment and reducing the burden of subsidies on the taxpayer. Power generation companies and developers often bear the brunt of these policies, requiring substantial capital expenditures (capex) to build out capacity. Without adequate compensation, this capex could weaken their creditworthiness. And while government support mechanisms such as rate-based feed-in tariffs may underpin sector credit quality to some extent, we believe the sustainability of such mechanisms will continue to face intense scrutiny as governments focus on fiscal austerity. This, combined with the need to conform to climate policies, could force a deceleration of the record growth of investment in clean energy.
"